Is Apple developing robocars or not? The company has neither denied, or confirmed it. The unmanned vehicle enthusiasts have to guess by who goes into the Apple building, and who leaves it. Guesswork by others can be very entertaining, I must admit. It\u2019s very interesting if you would need a premium Apple ID to ride shotgun. Or if the iCar would have a proprietary filler pipe and a gas cap so that you\u2019d have to use Apple branded gas pumps only.<\/p>\n
If you think you won\u2019t live long enough to see it, you\u2019re wrong. On October 19, 2016, the hearings about new traffic safety regulations were held in California. And Apple was among the vendors which questioned the live restrictions pertaining the unmanned vehicles. Like we all know, friends and neighbors, Apple never does anything just for the sake of it. And they in Cupertino, already have their fingers in this pie.<\/p>\n
So, will we see iCars for the price of two Ferraris? We may or we may not. Let me explain. What does in mean, developing a robocar? Does it involve the salon design or a motor design as well? Or does it go only for software development? Here\u2019s where the interests of the car making and the IT industries clash. The car industry giants, BMW for instance, have been long trying their hands in making robocars.<\/p>\n
A modern car has so many computer-controlled features, that making it wholly automated seems just a tiny step to cover. Perhaps add another two radars and cameras properly hidden under the hood, and off you go! Yet, this is where the IT crowd is to come in, because unmanned piloting requires the state-of-the-art software, in order to process the data. The software departments are far inferior to motor engineering or salon design departments, which makes car making companies doomed to fail. On the other hand, instead of inflating the expenses for IT engineering, car makers can cooperate with the IT leading companies like Google, Microsoft and, yes, Apple.<\/p>\n
So, Apple is more likely in for developing robocars\u2019 software or operating system, rather than developing the car itself. Once the \u2018brain\u2019 is taught to drive, it doesn\u2019t matter what car they install it in. Thus, any car company will be able to have an iCar, so to say. I personally think however, that Apple will patent some iCar design and release vehicles of their own, hiding the vendors chain from the plain view like they did with all their products. If you didn\u2019t know, Apple took the spare parts from Samsung, LG and Philips in order to build their own phone. On the other hand, if anything goes wrong with the unmanned vehicles behavior, Apple will be the one to take all the blame from the public, while car companies will stay clean. A frozen iMac is one thing, but a car, ramming the curb, is quite another.<\/p>\n
For these reasons alone, I understand why Apple is so secretive about the project. Such secrecy can also be explained by the fact that they are far from achieving anything market-ready. Perhaps, they\u2019ll start with inserting some car control features in their xOS. Like, lifting or lowering the door windows or switching on\\off the windscreen wipers. Whenever you spot it, that will mean that the robocars future is almost here.<\/p>\n
See also:<\/p>\n